Global moral standards engulf the ethics being observed in
selected geographical locations.
Countries that are being labeled as a morally right or morally wrong in
terms of political governance are subject to the approval of the global
society’s acceptance.
 |
| http://hi.baidu.com/luyufu |
However, with
countries with same ideological perspective though their conceptual ideologies
are not in accordance to the United Nations standards; still they can create a
group that can pacify their ideologies.
With this premise, we can totally argue that a political ideology can be
right if the public will accept the core concepts of the political beliefs. As
a result countries will compare different government policy standards in order
to get the good aspects of political beliefs and applying it to the
International political arena. Another
aspect that political practitioners must consider is the political Sovereignty
of the country.
Referring to the distinct
political rituals and customs of a country the political sovereignty of one
country may not be in accordance to another country of representation but
similarities may connect countries for the purpose of uniting nations. As a result political hypocrisy will lower to
accommodate and tolerate the differences of another country. The policy of EU or ASEAN group of countries
for example, needs a thorough review of the political guidelines of each
country in order to determine the tolerance of a given country in terms of
political beliefs and hypocrisy.
Resulting from the vivid observation of political backgrounds for each
member countries, the ultimate concern that International community must
consider is the moral limits of each country.
Moral backgrounds of each country representing the group of countries
are fundamentally inclined towards the dominant religious background of a given
country. As such, in terms of uniting
countries into one global community needs a huge participation of
non-government organization to mold the religious moral background of the whole
global community. The tolerance of
religious beliefs and culture will pave the way of oneness and global
reconciliation. A given country cannot
change the culture and teachings of another country but rather understand other
countries’ overall national culture and ideology.
Having said that non-government agency’s
participation is needed to itemize the activities by units in a given country,
global movement of government unification is needed to achieve the overall goal
of the national leaders representing the movement. The advantages of having a common
governmental guideline are the simplicity in transacting International
negotiations. Either business or other
faculties of the nation, having links with International communities is an
advantage not only to the country represented but the whole community.
Finally, I would say that in reconsidering
the unification of International laws and cross border guidelines, the global
community and its political security will be a reality sooner.
Comments