Quite a while now since the conflict of scarborough shore is
in the highlight of the international political conflict. As usual, since world war two Philippines is
still the dormant of the international political conflict. As of this time the US congress is planning
to supply more military arms in the Philippines to support the defensive stance
against China. Other allies of US and
Philippines headed by Japan and Korea are also in the frontline of the campaign
to eradicate the political harassment being executed by the Chinese government
since the conflict started. On the
contrary, China together with Brunei and Russia are also executing their
military exercises in the region as of this time to show might and military power
against the allied forces after the allied forces headed by Japan and US
conducted their military exercises few months ago. The military infrastructure of Chinese
military is already in the islands of the Philippines which causes alarm to the
allied forces NATO and the UN. Analyzing
the side of the Chinese government, why the government of China is so
interested with the shores of West Philippines; I believe it is not only the
oil deposit of the disputed area which the Philippine government is always
protecting knowing that the area of responsibility is part of Philippines
natural resources.
But to understand deeper what is the root cause of the
conflict reflects the history of the allied war during World War 2 when the
allied forces tries to dominate in the pacific.
As of this time Guam and Hawaii and other small islands owned by US
government are the military frontline and the strategic military assembly point
for any tactical offensive. In this
manner both Chinese and Russian military tactical analyst perceived that by
getting some islands near Philippines will advance their military facilities suppressing
the allied forces dominance in the pacific.
Unluckily, The island of the Philippines is the best choice of the Russian
and Chinese Military knowing that Hong Kong and Taiwan is in a shaky political
loyalty towards the mainland China. Upon
reading some literatures today, the political tension in the pacific reflects
the political war scenario in Europe before, during the Russian and German
political war conflict.
Europe is
divided into several political sides and one part of the literature review that
catched my attention in a way that the Philippines is in a same political picture
with Russia before is what Russian
people is in a division were the general public of Russia at that time is divided in
terms of their political ideology. On
the contrary, at present Philippine political setup is also divided in terms of
political ideology were some part of the general public supports the ideals of
the mainland China and generally the people of the Philippines are supporting the US democratic form of
government. This divided political setup
of the Philippine government will allow the Chinese government to penetrate
strategically in terms of their military tactics and intelligence knowing that
the general public of the Philippines is divided in terms of ideology.
America must see to it that democratic form
of government still rules in the pacific or else the Russian teachings will
penetrate the islands of the pacific and give an authoritative influence of the
Chinese and the North Koreans. And when
this time will happen I’m not sure if the islands of the pacific is still a
good place for tourism. Furthermore,
Russian government is planning to transfer their capital from Moscow to some
small cities near Asia and China to be specific, meaning Russian dominance is
clearly shifting from Europe to Asia Under the flagship of China and North
Korea. How much longer can the Filipino
people understand the help given by the US government to the Philippines. As
what some are saying, “We don’t need no education” to understand the blatant
presentation between the two ideologies that creates trouble not only in the
pacific and Europe but throughout the globe.
Academic View of Russian Military and Political Invasion in Europe, Pacific, and the World
Comments