The 2010 European crisis is a deja vu of the 2008 crisis that proves the creation of EU is a failure to the actual and present political and economic situation of each and every EU member countries. The book publication of Joseph E. Stiglitz narrates the many side effects of EU governance in the member countries of EU and the world. The book of Stiglitz “The Euro and its Threat to the Future of Europe” gives us an idea as to why the Kingdom of England decided to break away with EU last June 23, 2016. The Nobel Prize winner Stiglitz only analysis the economic and political side of EU and its effect in Brexit and the International Market but in this blog article I would incorporate the writings of Brendan Simms “Britain’s Europe A Thousand Years of Conflict and Cooperation” to open the readers mind as to why EU creation after the Berlin Wall did not succeed to the actual and practical political and economic setup of the whole of Europe most especially to the government of England.
British Royal Guard
The book of Stiglitz emphasize right away in
the first chapter of his book the crisis and the negative effect of EU
political machinery that is being implemented by the group of countries that
alarms the balance of society in terms of economics. The crisis in EU last 2010 clearly shows the
gap between the poor and the rich member countries that if you look at the aim
of EU political mechanism, EU’s main purpose is to equalize the economic gap
but as a result more problems in Greece took place not only money wise but also
employment market. Many people in Europe
are jobless due to the high inflation affecting from the companies and the
local commodities. The events that
precipitated the acute euro crisis were symptoms of deeper problems in the
structure of the Eurozone, not its causes: interest rates on the bonds issued
by Greece and several of the Eurozone countries soared, peaking in the case of
Greece at 22.5 percent 2012. The few good men who created the political
machine of EU did not consider the many factors that a united government like
EU will encounter many national laws and sovereignty aspects that each member
countries are keeping its legacy from their historic ancestors.
Professor Joseph E. Stiglitz
Thus, no trust in terms of politics and
economics aspect are shared from all member countries that one member country
can hardly share political information for example that will downgrade the
national security of the country and will probably result to economic collapse
of one member country. Thus, England did
not hesitate to breakaway with EU last June 23, 2016. Further study of Stiglitz reveals that EU political
machinery and governance are only full of ideas and beliefs that are not tested
to the actual markets in EU. The crooked
thing with government unification is that one given country are only willing to
give up information in terms of economics. But when country is ask to give up their
defense and military confidentials it is but very hard to give up all given the
fact that defense information is subject to national security issues. Having
said that, the governments of France and England for example are two big super
power Kingdoms that they have a history of power struggle in Europe since
1100-1200. As I read the book of Brendan
Simms I understand the deeper context as to how EU is just a “Bubble Pop”
government or I should say a fly by night government that is being tested in
Europe AGAIN.
I say AGAIN because it is
not after the Berlin Wall they’ve tried to establish an EU type of political
machines but long time ago according to Brendan Simms that Europe is trying to
united all the member countries to eliminate economic and political inequality.
But in the case of France and England it
is a thousand years of conflict that cooperation is somewhat “I can’t give
everything” attitude. Both England and
France are very concern when it comes to their national sovereignty. These two
countries are very nationalistic in terms of their political and economic
values. The concept of EU I presumed
that it is only from the point of view of an economist and a businessmen
perspective. International Business
policy wise EU system is very advantageous to the smaller countries like Greece
who can benefit the economic cycle and EU policy benefits. But to the bigger countries like England,
France, & Germany they are only the milking cows of these smaller members
that in the longer years of EU political system it started to decline in terms
of trust and cooperation in all member countries. If you can analyze the concept and ideology of
COMMUNISM it relates to the failure of the political machine being applied to
the society.
Both COMMUNISM and EU type
of governance is in a failure in terms of the application of the ideology to
the people in Europe. As to Lenin on
the Train he failed the economic side of governance that their Utopian
dream of governance turnout to be an arms race.
That what had happened during the cold war. Cold war time is the moment when Communism
ideology is decaying in terms of its international governance popularity. On the contrary, EU likewise is also a
political system and machine that it did not fly yet but it crushed
already. According to Stiglitz it is an
agreement failure that the member countries did signed during 1992. Luckily, England decided to breakaway that
allowed other member countries to retaliate for the reason avoiding the early
decay of the Union.
EU AND THE INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL CONCUBINES:
Just like communism, EU starts to spread its political pattern
and machinery in the international arena.
EU starts to mingle with other countries in Asia preaching their policy
and guidelines not knowing that the mechanism is not even effective in EU itself. Moreover, as EU tries to influence Asian
countries they can use POLITICAL PARTIES THAT ARE MINORITY IN THE CHAMBER to
plant the seed of EU governance same with the communism before and during the Vietnam
War and Korean War. Furthermore, MEDIA
is a useful tool of EU to dominate and preach their failed governance in
planting the “CREED OF EU” to the local minds of the Asian countries. In page 44-45 of the writings of Stiglitz
argues that “There are courts, too, that rule on human rights issues
anywhere in Europe (for example, the European Court of Human Rights). The EU is unusual in having taken some forms
of integration quite far- and yet gone slowly in others.”
Like communism, EU policy is only a “bubble pop” governance
that starts to lure the minds of the many politicians in Asia. MINORITY POLITICAL GROUPS AND MEDIA are the
usual tool to divide and conquer the political machine of a given country. Be very careful, war today as I have said in
my previous article blogs that it is not like World War 1 and 2 that it is
between military might and engineering power of the many military equipment’s
but today we fight in a diplomatic way. DIPLOMATIC WAR is more lethal and painful to
the people who are very patriotic to their country like England. Good for England they declared Brexit last
June 23, 2016 or else EU political machinery will EAT ENGLAND'S NATIONAL
SOVEREIGNTY.
Money wise, EU has a lot of money to lend to the 3rd
world countries. But according to
Stiglitz publication that EU’s lending system to the smaller countries are
given a very high interest rates that a country who is struggling to pay in
terms of their debts in the world bank will have no way to go in terms of the
national government financing but to sign according to the terms of the EU
CREED. It is but very clear that England
did the first move to evade the continued political governance of EU in the
Sovereign government of England. But
still EU tries to prove its usefulness to sell their ideology and political
system to other parts of the world. I
don’t know when and how many countries will be benefitted and distracted as
well. I hope countries will learn a
lesson from the communism and EU type of political machinery that the theory
and method is really good in terms of the dream of having a utopian type of
society and a unified economic program limiting the tariffs in the various economic
borders, but these two types of political machinery failed to address the
actual variables that a given domestic community treasured for many centuries
like England and the case of BREXIT, EU's political system today is like a parasite creeping other
governments around the world and planting the CREED of EU.
As what Joseph E. Stiglitz emphasize in his
publication that POLITICAL SYSTEM like EU fail to test and re test their system
that in the case of BREXIT the EU type of governance did not prevail due to the
fact that it is never been tested. What
actually happened during the hype after the Breaking of Berlin Wall last 1992
Europe wants to unite but they did not realize the many aspect of diplomacy
that they need to consider given the fact that European countries itself passed
many conflicts since the Kingdoms of the Vikings and other Kingdoms of Spain,
Germany, and France. Lastly, in the case
of England and BREXIT sovereignty prevails rather than the EU type of
governance. So what could be the best
way to balance economic integration and political sovereignty rights? Do you
think EU policy and governance will threaten other governments in Asia and the World? Since EU is a government failed to launch in
the international arena, Do you think ASEAN treaty will be like EU as well?
Or is your government also a “Bubble Pop” fly by night EU
Concubine?
Are you a Bubble Pop
Comments